Dell'Orso: Bibliography formatting software: An Evaluation template: a comparison between ProCite, EndNote, Reference Manager, Ppapyrus

12 Export
Pr: yes	En: yes, it is equal to "printing"
RM: yes	Papyrus: yes, it is equal to "printing"
12.1 Export formats 1. delimited: comma, tab, <CR>, other 2. tagged 3. ISO 2709 4. MARC 5. proprietary format of other database
Pr: 1 can customize end of field and record, delimiter character if embedded in fields; 2 implies choosing or defining a style	En: 1: already made: tabbed and CDF ProCite 2: already made: EndNote, RIS, Refer, BibTex; implies choosing or defining a style, cannot completely design a new one; [5 see 1 2]
RM: 1 comma, tab; 2 RIS (style is preserved), Medlars	Papyrus: 1 (user has to create it); 2 already made: EndNote, RIS, BibTeX (support for character set conflicts); [5 see 2]
12.2 Fields that can be exported 1. all 2. some 3. RT 4. RN
Pr: 1 2 3 4 options: a) all 45 fields i campi comunque, b) all fields used in the involved workforms c) just those selected on the fly + workform description	En: 1 2 3 4
RM: 1, no options	Papyrus: 1 2 4